Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Thomas v. Goff et al
as 1:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Preston Goff, Jr., B. Davis, J. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy DeBose v. University of TX Health Sys, et al
as 13-20179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY DEBOSE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS, B DAVIS, SHANTA CRAWFORD and others
Debose v. University of Texas Health Systems et al
as 4:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
Leroy Debose
Defendant:
University of Texas Health Systems, B. Davis, Shanta Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Viera
as 5:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Davis
Defendant:
Patricia A. Viera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laird et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
Clyde Warren Laird , Bruce W. Alexander , Raffael R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
In Re: BP, P.L.C. Securities, et al
as 12-20018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
BP, P.L.C., ANTHONY HAYWARD, ANDY INGLIS and others
In Re: BP Shareholder, et al
as 12-20019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HAYWARD, IAIN CONN, ROBERT DUDLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01540
Plaintiff:
Tammy B Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
