Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Schambach et al v. Mandeville City et al
as 2:2020cv00214
Defendant:
State of Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services, City of Mandeville, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Schambach and Aurora Schambach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2020cv00475
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Thelma Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strange v. Doe #1 et al
as 5:2019cv01096
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #1 and Prospect America Inc
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Taplette v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00448
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Vincent Knight, Uknown Whittaker and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan R Taplette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Webre et al
as 3:2019cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ramon Torres
Defendant:
Bobby Webre, Warden Paul Hall, John Doe 7 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, John Doe #1, John Doe # 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Dontrale Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thymes v. A T & T Mobility Services L L C et al
as 6:2019cv00090
Defendant:
C I A / F B I Cointelpro, Does 2 thru 25, A T & T Mobility Services L L C and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Gene Thymes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.P. v. Gusman et al
as 2:2019cv02383
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson 2, Deputy Johnson, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
W.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sans Chevaux Investments LLC v. Carl Gene Thymes
as 6:2019cv00060
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility L L C, L'Auberge Casino & Hotel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Sans Chevaux Investments L L C and Carl Gene Thymes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2019cv00036
Defendant:
John Doe #4, Jane Doe #1, Darrel Vannoy and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
