Cases 41 - 50 of 342
Flores-Esparza v. Garland
as 22-60041
Petitioner:
Monica Lucila Flores-Esparza
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Esparza v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv03231
Plaintiff:
Francisco Esparza
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Luna Esparza v. Garland
as 21-60959
Petitioner:
J. Reyes Luna Esparza
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Esparza v. Galveston College
as 21-40884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gilbert Alexander Esparza
Defendant / Appellee:
Galveston College, Vera Lewis-Jasper, Brian Ayres and others
Bilyeu et al v. Esparza et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Plaintiff:
Whitney Bilyeu, Mark Ash, Stephanie Berlin and others
Defendant:
Jose A. Esparza and John B. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Esparza
as 3:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
Fidencio Valdez
Defendant:
Jaime E. Esparza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00943
Plaintiff:
Richard Damon James Wilson and Damon James Wilson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Governor of Texas Greg Abbott, Texas Speaker Dade Phelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of United Latin American Citizens et al v. Abbott et al
as 3:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott
Consolidated Defendant:
Jose A. Esparza, State of Texas, Texas Speaker Dade Phelan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Damon James Wilson, Roy Charles Brooks, Akilah Bacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Esparza
as 9:2021cv00273
Plaintiff:
Fidencio Valdez
Defendant:
Jaime Esparza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esparza et al v. Katchoulev et al
as 5:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Orlando Esparza and Lori Yvette Cazarez
Defendant:
Dimitre Katchoulev and Matrix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
