Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Ruben Anderson v. James Burgess, et al
as 13-40484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN SOLIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BURGESS, Lieutenant at Telford, JASON SMITH, Lieutenant at Telford, RICKY LEAKES, Lieutenant at Telford and others
Ruben Anderson v. Kaydo, et al
as 12-40880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN SOLIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU KAYDO, Assistant Warden at Telford, FNU GOODEN, Captain at Telford Unit, MEDICAL STAFF MEMBERS AT TELFORD UNIT and others
Anderson v. Burgess et al
as 5:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
James. Burgess, Jason Smith, Ricky Leakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnes, et al v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
Betty Kincaid Quarles and Justin Noel Burnes
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Douglas Gillespie, Leake County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LaShare v. Leake County
as 3:2011cv00700
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen LaShare
Defendant:
Leake County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain v. Smith et al
as 5:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N Cain
Defendant:
Lonnie Smith and Ricky Leaks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Kaydo et al
as 5:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Kaydo, FNU Gooden, Medical Staff members at Telford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain v. Leake County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lamar Cain
Defendant:
Leake County Correctional Facility, Greg Waggoner, Micheal Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Leake County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2010cv00403
Plaintiff:
Debbie Ross
Defendant:
Leake County, Mississippi, Justin Sims, Johnny Nealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
