Cases 41 - 50 of 4,525
Nelson v. Stanga et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Howard J Nelson
Defendant:
Gary T Stanga, Kelsey Miller, William R Penton, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Barrett
as 24-10396
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Miller
Defendant:
Amy Coney Barrett, In Her Official Capacity, Neil Gorsuch, In His Official Capacity, John G. Roberts, In His Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Miller et al v. RMP Transport Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MILLER and VENUS JOHN
Defendant:
RPM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. and PAUL DAVID NAKUNZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Kroger
as 24-20182
Plaintiff:
Ryan Edward Miller
Defendant:
Kroger Company and Kroger Texas, L.P.
Rogers v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dontravian Rogers
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Unknown Defendant, Unknown Hardin and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
