Cases 41 - 50 of 2,629
Montalto v. Shaw
as 23-60151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Montalto
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Shaw, Warden, Management Training Corporation, Jaburious Jackson, Unit Manager and others
Shaw v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Shaw
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
FILING ERROR
as 5:2023cv00345
Defendant:
WESTERN RAIL ROAD COMPANY
Claimant:
Dustin SHAW
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Shaw vs. Western Rail Road Company
as 5:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Dustin SHAW
Defendant:
WESTERN RAIL ROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Shaw v. Kuntz et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Shaw
Defendant:
FNU Kuntz, Laura Gordon and FNU Led
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Pickle et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Shaw
Defendant:
Ann Pickle, Mitchell Newman, Debbie Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Shaw et al
as 4:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Jehu Castillo
Defendant:
Hannah Rose Shaw and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shaw v. Sentry Select Insurance Co et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
James G. Shaw and James G Shaw
Defendant:
Sentry Select Insurance Co, Clyde Burress, J. M. Bozeman Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shaw v. Pickle et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Shaw
Defendant:
Ann Pickle, Mitchell Newman, Jasper County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. JPS Health Network et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dillon Flores
Defendant:
JPS Health Network, Dr. Shaw, Dr. Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
