Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Shank v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2012cv00695
Defendant:
Cody Butler, N. Burl Cain, Perry Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Shank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Frazier v. Tony Wingo, et al
as 12-30300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY WINGO and UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICER(S)
Morgan v. Richards et al
as 7:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kassan Khalid Morgan
Defendant:
NFN Richards, NFN Satterfield, NFN Dardenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Mannifee et al
as 1:2012cv00479
Plaintiff:
Chandar Bingham
Defendant:
Mannifee, Keffer, Sherrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cortez v. Tamez, et al
as 4:2011cv00888
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cortez
Defendant:
Several Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael Crosby v. Bing Crosby, et al
as 11-31187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
BING CROSBY, MARY CROSBY, MONTY FORBESS and others
Gereb v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2011cv03418
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gereb
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Allen v. Owen Murray, et al
as 11-41124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
OWEN MURRAY, D.O., C. SWIFT, R.N., B.S.N.; Head of Medical Department at Mark W. Stiles Unit, GIDEON DANIEL, Physician Assistant, Doctor of the Stiles Unit and others
Leavitt v. Reagans et al
as 4:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Scott Leavitt
Defendant:
K. Reagans, Unknown Warden, Unknown Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Numerous Bureau of Prison Officials et al
as 1:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
Numerous Bureau of Prison Officials, FNU Carter, Numerous Unknown Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
