Cases 51 - 60 of 1,053
Dingler v. Dallas County, Texas
as 23-10679
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas County, Texas, Marian Brown, Terrie McVea and others
Holmes v. Reddoch
as 23-30424
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant / Appellant:
Corbett Reddoch and Gerald A. Turlich, Jr., in his official capacity as sheriff of Plaquemines Parish
Holmes, et al v. XL Specialty Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry (Bud) Holmes, Jay House, Channing Kammlah and others
Defendant:
XL Specialty Insurance Company
Intervenor:
Ross Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Amezquita v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Richard Luis Amezquita
Defendant:
E Holmes, Crystal Breauz, Isaac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beason v. Warden Holmes
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Beason
Defendant:
Warden Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Nino
as 23-40385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Holmes v. Baker Hughes
as 4:2023cv02171
Plaintiff:
Richard Holmes
Defendant:
Baker Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Trackling v. Holmes
as 3:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Hollis et al
as 2:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
Glenda M Holmes
Defendant:
Dondria L Hollis, Dr. Michelle Cooper, Dr. Eillen S Black and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
JXN Undivided Coalition et al v. Tindell et al
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, People's Advocacy Institute and others
Defendant:
Sean Tindell and Bo Luckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
