Cases 51 - 60 of 264
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Roach et al
as 4:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
Bobby Turner
Defendant:
Sharen Wilson, Charles nmn Roach, Asst District Atty Michelle Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2019cv13114
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 4:2019cv03776
Plaintiff:
Robert Roach
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sanfilippo Estates v. Mortenson Stevenson CIA et al
as 3:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Mortenson Stevenson CIA and Polygamy Roaching FBI files
Plaintiff:
The Sanfilippo Estates
Not Yet Classified:
In Regards To Emille Volf Mortenson Cia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Krishnakrupa of America, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00448
Defendant:
Krishnakrupa of America, LLC, John Does 1-10 and XYZ Corporations 1-10
Plaintiff:
Patricia Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harold Nix, et al v. USA
as 19-40480
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY L. PATTERSON, HAROLD W. NIX, CHARLES C. PATTERSON and others
Roach v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bradley Roach
Defendant:
Tony Monsiavais, Jeff Calloway, Maxey Cerliano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Plano Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Joseph Suter Claggett, John Roach, Michele Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Perry Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Plano Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv01069
Defendant:
Joseph Suter Claggett, John Roach, Michele Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Perry Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
