Cases 51 - 60 of 21,450
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Elzey v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sorita Elzey
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Chris Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scharr v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv02124
Plaintiff:
Robert Scharr
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ward v. Nesibo et al
as 3:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Ward
Defendant:
Adil Ahmed Nesibo and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Hoard v. Texas Attorney General
as 3:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Robert Hoard, IV
Defendant:
Texas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Wellness Pain & Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02091
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Wellness Pain & Associates, Inc., Midtown Surgical Group Corp., Azog, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Norris Robert
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center, Southern Health Partnership and Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NicQuid v. FDA
as 24-60272
Petitioner:
NicQuid, L.L.C. and Wood Creek Vapory
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cervini v. Cisneros
as 24-50442
Plaintiff:
Eric Cervini, Wendy Davis, David Gins and others
Defendant:
Eliazar Cisneros, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
