Cases 61 - 70 of 2,914
Duffy et al v. Macalinao et al
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ian Duffy, Samuel Lee and Douglas Boyle
Defendant:
Ian Macalinao and Dylan Macalinao
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Patterson v. So-Thorn Therapeutic Health Cannabinoids, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Patterson
Defendant:
So-Thorn Therapeutic Health Cannabinoids, LLC, SoThorn, LLC and Alva Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant:
AGILON HEALTH, INC., Steven J Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Acosta v. O'Malley
as 24-10233
Plaintiff:
Samuel Raul Acosta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Hammons v. Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers, et al.
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Houston Samuel Hammons
Defendant:
Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers, Fannin Co TX and State of TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pulido v. Unit Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pulido
Defendant:
Unit Corporation, Unit Drilling Company and Unit Petroleum Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Skinner v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Lakyia T. Skinner
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Burl Cain, Eddie Veal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hammons v. Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Houston Samuel Hammons
Defendant:
Fannin County Police Officers, Fannin Co TX, State of TX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
