Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Stalons et al v. Houston Chronical et al
as 4:2018cv02453
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 5, Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Stalons Betty, Richard Stalons and Betty Stalons
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Domain Protection LLC v. Sea Wasp LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01578
Plaintiff:
Domain Protection LLC
Defendant:
Sea Wasp LLC and Doe 1 - Doe 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Burnett v. Warden John Doe 4 et al
as 4:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Leon Thomas Burnett
Defendant:
Warden John Doe 4, John Doe 1 White, John Doe 2 Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed Omran v. Robert Wyche, et al
as 18-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN AB OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WYCHE, STEVE PRATOR, ARDISE HICKS and others
Johnson v. Cazes et al
as 3:2017cv01752
Defendant:
Acadian Ambulance Services, Inc., Esdron Brown, Mike Cazes and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In re: Baylor University
as 17-50988
Petitioner:
In re: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Respondent:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
Cole v. Max Mahan Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cole
Defendant:
John Doe 1 through John Doe 5, John Doe 6 through John Doe 10 and Max Mahan Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kharb, Praveen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kharb
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Taylor County et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ken David Scott
Defendant:
Taylor County, TX, Ricky Bishop, Taylor County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
