Cases 71 - 80 of 699
Cunningham v. Sanofi US Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01163
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Aventis Pharma S.A., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spikes v. Jasper County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00286
Defendant:
City Of Jasper, Ryan Cunningham, Jasper County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Lanieka Spikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2021cv00852
Defendant:
Sergeant Evan Cox, Officer Jeffrey Crouch, Officer Michael Devezin and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Roes 1-50
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Chustz, Bilal Ali-Bey and Remingtyn A Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
FNU Parks, D Dobbs, FNU Saha and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Edgar Flores
Defendant:
M. Cunningham, Terry Mason, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Sanders et al
as 6:2021cv00145
Defendant:
Susan E Cunningham, Richard J Babcock, Shayna M McArthur and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Copiah County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jacques R. Gilmore
Defendant:
Nadean Sutton, Byrom Swilley, Charlene Hilliard and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. Jordan et al
as 4:2021cv00267
Defendant:
Michael Minniear, Ramone Smith, Billy Wilks and others
Plaintiff:
Interstate Service Provider, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ford v. Cunningham et al
as 4:2021cv00698
Defendant:
Richard Morris, Herbert Gilbert, City of Madisonville Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
