Cases 71 - 80 of 1,056
Centennial Bank v. Holmes, et al
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Jerry "Bud" Holmes, Jay House, Channing Baisley and others
USA v. Holmes
as 23-30096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rhobashi Holmes, also known as Wild Card Holmes
Holmes v. Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C
as 5:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Holmes
Defendant:
Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shafer v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Senior Warden E. Holmes and Janet Salles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. O'Daniel et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rodney Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier, Billy Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOH Oil v. Kahle
as 23-50098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOH Oil Company and Craig A. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Aaron Kahle, Steve Kerrigan, Stephen Yerkovich and others
Holmes v. BellSouth Telecommunications L L C
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Pia Holmes
Defendant:
BellSouth Telecommunications L L C doing business as A T & T Southeast and BellSouth Telecommunications L L C doing business as A T & T Louisiana
Counter Claimant:
BellSouth Telecommunications L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jordan v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
Lt. Brown, Warden Andrew, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Sch Bd of Avoyelles Prsh
as 23-30029
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Allen Holmes, individually and obo minor child Q H
Defendant / Appellee:
School Board of Avoyelles Parish
Holmes v. Pulliam
as 5:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Holmes
Defendant:
Jason Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
