Cases 71 - 80 of 935
Smith v. TDCJ et al
as 6:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Parren Smith
Defendant:
TDCJ, TBCJ, J Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Artie Joseph Riley, Jr.
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Nalisha Riley
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strongin et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Kyle Strongin, Lindsey Gremont, Christine Koepke and others
Defendant:
John B. Scott, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, Secretary of State of Texas and others
Not Classified By Court:
Honorable Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Weinstein & Riley PS
as 3:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Defendant:
Weinstein & Riley, P.S. and Weinstein & Riley PS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Summers v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Stephen Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Reuben Reed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Jessica Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
