Cases 81 - 90 of 25,579
Doe (C.A.A.) v. G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (C.A.A.)
Defendant:
G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, G6 Hospitality IP, LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reynolds v. Sudman et al
as 4:2024cv01920
Plaintiff:
Loren-Michael Reynolds
Defendant:
Harry Shiel Sudman, Greg D Porter, Rodriguez & Porter, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Sherrill et al
as 7:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
McKenzie H. Sherrill, Bryan D. Reitsma and Kevin B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cashe v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1
as 2:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Cashe
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 d/b/a St. Tammany Parish Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Majarro v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Noe Carrillo Majarro
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guajardo v. Lincoln National Corporation
as 7:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Diana Guajardo
Defendant:
Lincoln National Corporation d/b/a Lincoln Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
