Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kubota Tractor Corporation v. Keim TS Inc.
as 4:2022cv03196
Plaintiff:
Kubota Tractor Corporation
Defendant:
Keim TS Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Keim v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02703
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Keim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01574
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shaw, Stanley Keim, Hazel Wehrle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lair v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv13285
Plaintiff:
Pamela Keim Lair and Frank D. Ippolito
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. LTV Tower Apts et al
as 3:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jackie Dickson-Lee, Odell Weeks-Lee, Robert C Lee, III and others
Defendant:
Alan Solis, Dining In Inc, K Keim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Renfro v. Matt Bingham, et al
as 18-40135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. RENFRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT BINGHAM, PETER KEIM, KERRY L. RUSSELL and others
Jeremy Hendricks v. Matt Bingham, et al
as 17-40144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY JAMES HENDRICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT BINGHAM and PETER KEIM
Renfro v. Bingham et al
as 6:2016cv01228
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Renfro
Defendant:
Matt Bingham, Peter Keim and Kerry L Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Bingham et al
as 6:2016cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Hendricks
Defendant:
Matt Bingham and Peter Keim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Downing et al
as 3:2016cv00385
Plaintiff:
Etoia L. Tolbert
Defendant:
James B. Downing and Keim TS Trucking (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
