Cases 1 - 10 of 4,528
Sims v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Wesley Robert Sims
Defendant:
Keith Miller, Joshua Finkley and Michael Cunningham
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leggett v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Deshun R. Leggett
Defendant:
Tyree Jones, Hinds County, Mississippi, Lt. Tyler and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Julapalli v. Boom
as 24-20276
Plaintiff:
Venodhar Julapalli
Defendant:
Marc L. Boom, President, in his Official and Individual Capacities, Robert A. Phillips, Chief Physician Executive, in his Official and Individual Capacities, H. Dirk Sostman, Chief Academic Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miller v. Prentiss County
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jason Miller
Defendant:
Prentiss County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Doss et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Doss, Bethany Miller and Aimee Jarvis
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sims v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Wesley Robert Sims
Defendant:
Keith Miller, Joshua Finkley and Michael Cunningham
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
