Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dantley v. Crossroads Transit, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Brianna Dantley
Defendant:
Crossroads Transit, LLC, Progressive Commercial Advantage Agency, Inc. and Torrance Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randle v. Avina
as 24-10286
Plaintiff:
Brianna Randle and Sywayne Burgess
Defendant:
Cindy Avina, Individually and in her professional capacity
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Hundley
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brianna Ranicya Hundley
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Pruvit Ventures, Inc. v. Blackburn
as 4:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Pruvit Ventures, Inc.
Defendant:
Brianna Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00890
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simmons v. Safepoint Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04459
Plaintiff:
Brianna Simmons
Defendant:
Safepoint Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jones v. Sicking et al
as 6:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jabias D. Jones
Defendant:
William E. Sicking, Greg Abbott, Cecile Erwin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
