Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Muhammad v. Wiles
as 23-50786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Wiles, El Paso County Sheriff, Marco Vargas, Kevin Lanahan and others
English v. Aramark
as 21-20554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant / Appellee:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C.
Johnson v. Madison County et al
as 3:2021cv00335
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Sheriff Randy Tucker, Nurse Manager Jane Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01828
Defendant:
Prison Realty Management, LLC, Robert Lacy, Jr., CoreCivic, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bilal Muhammad v. Richard Wiles, et al
as 20-50279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID STOUT, RICARDO SAMANIEGO, EL PASO COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
Muhammad v. Wiles et al
as 3:2019cv00367
Defendant:
John Doe 1-125, Joanne Bernal, Aramark Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tahri v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv04417
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Tahri
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myart, Jr. v. Wolff, et al
as 5:2019cv01286
Defendant:
Bexar County, Nelson W. Wolff, David Smith and others
Plaintiff:
James Myart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jake English v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 19-20412
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE ANTHONY ENGLISH
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
