Cases 1 - 10 of 905
Cantu v. NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Morena Cantu
Defendant:
NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Auction.com, John Sisk, Colette Mayer, Stephen Mayers, Israel Curtis, Dana Dennen, Burce Miller, C.Jason Spence, Marcia Chapa, Dylan Ruiz, Amy Ortiz, Evan Press, Lacrecia Robinson, Daniel McQuade, Aleena Litton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cantu v. Austin Plce Dept
as 24-50397
Plaintiff:
M. Patricia Cantu and Roberto Cantu
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, Michael Joseph, Sergeant, Austin Police Department, Jacob Beirowski, Officer, Austin Police Department and others
Cantu v. USA
as 3:2024cv01217
Petitioner:
Christopher Joe Cantu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston, Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Texas at Dallas and Democratic Socialists of America
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, University of Houston, University of Houston System Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01124
Petitioner:
Christopher Cantu-Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Carlos Mario Cantu-Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Estevis v. Cantu
as 24-40277
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Estevis
Defendant:
Ignacio Cantu, In their individual capacities and Eduardo Guajardo, In their individual capacities
Quiroz v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Estaban Cantu Quiroz
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Warden Flistman and Doctor Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
