Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hawkins v. USA
as 9:2024cv00163
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Hawkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Gates et al v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates, Robert Hornsby, Cory Mooney and others
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Hawkins
as 22-40766
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Hawkins, Jr.
Hawkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00053
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ray Charles Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03112
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins and Jacqueline Hawkins
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc., Combe Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Hawkins v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 12-20645
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Hawkins v. Livingston
as 4:2012cv02199
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins
Defendant:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01802
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Livingston
as 1:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins
Defendant:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins et al v. Yazoo County et al
as 5:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Hawkins and The Estate of Ruthie Hawkins
Defendant:
Yazoo County , Yazoo County Sheriff's Department and All Unknown Officers and Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
