Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joyce Reddell
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks et al v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2013cv03000
Plaintiff:
David L Hicks and Mary F Scaglione
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, City of Shreveport, Police Dept of Shreveport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Overton Brooks V A Police et al
as 5:2013cv02308
Plaintiff:
David L Hicks
Defendant:
Overton Brooks V A Police and D McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Hicks v. Johna Page, et al
as 13-30083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNA PAGE, ROY R. HALL, M. A. BIANCO and others
TGS-Nopec Geophysical Company v. Hicks et al
as 4:2011cv02018
Defendant:
David O. Hicks, Matchless Geophysical Inc., Terra Energy Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
TGS-Nopec Geophysical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks et al v. Caddo Parish Animal Control et al
as 5:2012cv01548
Plaintiff:
David L Hicks and Mary F Scaglione
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Animal Control and Police Dept City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Ratliff
as 1:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
David P. Hicks
Defendant:
Tommy Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hicks v. Johna Page, et al
as 10-30577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNA PAGE, ROY R HALL, M A BIANCO and others
Dewayle's International, Ltd. v. Hicks
as 1:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dewayle's International, Ltd.
Defendant:
David C. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dewayle's International, Ltd v. Williams Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dewayle's International, Ltd
Defendant:
Williams Industries, Inc. and David C. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
