Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bell v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2024xc00311
Petitioner: David Lamont Bell
Respondent: Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hill v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12687
Plaintiff: David Lamont Hill
Defendant: BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
USA v. David Liddell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60361
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID LAMONT LIDDELL
Liddell v. USA
as 3:2016cv00480
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: David Lamont Liddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
David Morgan v. Denison Police Department, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-40221
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID LAMONT MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee: DENISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ADRON DOUGLAS and JARED JOHNSON, Mayor of Denison
USA v. David Mangum
as 15-30136
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID LAMONT MANGUM
Morgan v. Denison Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00151
Plaintiff: David Lamont Morgan
Defendant: Denison Police Department, Adron Douglas and Jared Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00101
Plaintiff: David Lamont Morgan
Defendant: Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morgan v. Wilson
as 3:2013cv00315
Plaintiff: David Lamont Morgan
Defendant: Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bell v. Abraham et al
as 3:2012cv04033
Plaintiff: David Lamont Bell
Defendant: SRT. Abraham and NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?