Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Hamp v. Jane or John Doe
as 1:2024cv00157
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Brymon Hamp, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Siggers v. Hamp et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Reno Fenelli Siggers
Defendant:
K.C. Hamp, Sr., Jammie Lewis, Ms. Persundra Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR LUTHERANS v. Hampe et al
as 6:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Defendant:
Andrea May Hampe, Donna Hampe, Clifton Funeral Home, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hamp, Jr. v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brymon Hamp, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Timothy Morris, Dr. James Glisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamp v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Syreeta Hamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michel Thomas v. Grundfos, CBS, et al
as 20-20505
Defendant / Appellee:
Grundfos, Chau Nguyen, Billy Baxter and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michel Thomas
Kinnel v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, Sheriff K. C. Hamp, Jailer Sharon Hargrow and others
Plaintiff:
Tanyatta Kinnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Turner et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Warden Lee Simon, Lieutenant Hamp, C/O Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Earl Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
