Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown v. Kaufman County
as 23-10387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas G. Brown and Ella H. Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Kaufman County, City of Terrell, Texas, Jeff Brown and others
Brown et al v. Crow et al
as 3:2021cv02998
Plaintiff:
Ella H Brown and Thomas G Brown
Defendant:
Richard Crow, Wells Fargo Bank, Glenn Lynch Companies Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324
Brown et al v. Crow et al
as 3:2021cv00386
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, Lindsey Ray Smith, Jose Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Brown and Ella H Brown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cruise v. Hecht et al
as 1:2019cv00919
Defendant:
Eva Guzman, Debra Lehrmann, Paul W. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Michelle Cruise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robison Tire Company, Inc. v. World of Tires, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robison Tire Company, Inc.
Defendant:
World of Tires, Inc. and Jeff Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eric Drake v. Nathan Hecht, et al
as 16-10298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHAN L. HECHT, WILLIAM KEN TAPSCOTT, JR., BLAKE HAWTHORNE and others
Drake v. Hecht et al
as 7:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Nathan L Hecht , William Ken Tapscott, Jr, Blake Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barraza et al v. Carlton-Reed Electric, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01218
Plaintiff:
Rigo Barraza and Jeff Brown
Defendant:
Carlton-Reed Electric, Inc. and Michael J. Reed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Horton v. Shreveport City Marshall et al
as 5:2010cv00654
Plaintiff:
Michael C Horton
Defendant:
Shreveport City Marshall, Dennis Buckingham, Charlie Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
