Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mack v. Austin Police Dept. et al
as 1:2025cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mack
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. and City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dent v. Leadbetter et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert Dent
Defendant:
John Leadbetter, Randy Walker, C. Speth and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. BBVA Compass Bank et al
as 3:2018cv02725
Defendant:
New Home Solution and Investment, Cederic Lydelle Brown, American Dream and Educational Concepts and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Tucker and Eddie Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kenneth Mack v. Charles Rosenthal, et al
as 10-20055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES ROSENTHAL, FEAZEL, HAROLD HURTT and others
Brown et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv06942
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc, Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Brown, Willie Brown, Willie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Willie Brown, All Plaintiffs, Stacey Swanier and others
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mack v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2009cv01391
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mack
Defendant:
Charles Rosenthal, Ms. Feazel, Harold Hurtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Mack, et al
as 07-40610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNULFO ANDRES LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH MACK, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police of the Galveston Police Department, GALVESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF GALVESTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
