Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Monk v. Massey et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, FNU Vonn, FNU Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Clark v. The Sterno Group LLC
as 5:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
Keith Clark
Defendant:
The Sterno Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hill et al v. Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Hill , Donald Byther , Sandy Byther and others
Defendant:
Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc., HBC Board of Directors, Kenneth W. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Angelo Clark v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20480
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO KEITH CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Clark v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02673
Petitioner:
Angelo Keith Clark
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eastridge et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 2:2011cv03148
Plaintiff:
Ronny Eastridge , Robert Warren , Castaways, LLC and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Danos & Curole Staffing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Clark v. Officer Martin Sheriff Dept et al
as 4:2010cv04989
Plaintiff:
Angelo Keith Clark
Defendant:
Officer Martin Sheriff Dept and 4 unnamed Officers of the Harris County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angelo Clark v. Ernest Lykissa
as 10-20753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO KEITH CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNEST D. LYKISSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
