Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Linzy v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00780
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. doing business as Longhorn Steakhouse
Plaintiff:
Carylon Linzy
Pretrial Service:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woodberry v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Derrick Woodberry
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Kirt Guerin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shifflett v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01830
Petitioner:
Linzi Ladawn Shifflett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Linzy v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Linzy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 md
Linzie v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv13988
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Linzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. Foley et al
as 2:2018cv00188
Defendant:
Dustin Owens, Damon Andrews, Linzy S Rash and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Olivas Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Foley et al
as 2:2018cv00154
Defendant:
Dustin Owens, Linzy S Rash, Damon Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Edward Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Linzi Shifflett
as 17-11524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LINZI LADAWN SHIFFLETT
Linzie v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv14021
Plaintiff:
Catherine Linzie
Defendant:
Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
