Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 595
Leyva et al v. MPM DEVELOPMENT LP et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: Isaac Leyva and Augustin Leyva
Defendant: MPM DEVELOPMENT LP and Mossa "Moses" Mostaghasi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Eaglin v. Torres
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff: Moses Wayne Eaglin
Defendant: Paul A Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Wilkinson County School District et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Mose Hollins
Defendant: Wilkinson County School District and Shemekia Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moses v. Federal Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff: Joi Moses
Defendant: Federal Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mosely v. Morrell et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: Sh-Kaia Mosley and Sh-Kaia Mosely
Defendant: Margaret Morrell and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Horton et al v. Magnolia Park Apartments et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: Moses D. Horton and All Around Plumbing Service, LLC
Defendant: Magnolia Park Apartments and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Mosely v. Vault Reciprocal Exchange
as 3:2024cv00014
Defendant: Russell Long Mosely and Vault Reciprocal Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
In re: Edward Moses
as 24-90001
Petitioner: In re: Edward Moses, Jr.
Moses v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner: Robert Arthur Moses
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?