Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. Allen
as 3:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
Defendant:
Mark A. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Spencer et al v. City of Cibolo, Texas et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Mark D. Allen, Steven Quinn, City of Cibolo, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer John, Amy Byrd, Lisa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Allen v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Allen
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corporation of America (C.C.A), Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Allen v. Owen Murray, et al
as 11-41124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
OWEN MURRAY, D.O., C. SWIFT, R.N., B.S.N.; Head of Medical Department at Mark W. Stiles Unit, GIDEON DANIEL, Physician Assistant, Doctor of the Stiles Unit and others
Allen v. Murray et al
as 1:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
Mark A Allen
Defendant:
Owen Murray, C Swift, Gideon A Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie Evans v. GEO, et al
as 10-60344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO, EAST MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, D CASKEY, Warden and others
Ollie Evans v. GEO, et al
as 10-60194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO, EAST MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MARK S ALLEN, an inmate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
