Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Haire v. 5445 Caruth
as 24-10137
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Haire
Defendant:
5445 Caruth Haven Lane Apartments Owner, L.L.C., Lincoln Property Company, Incorporated, Travis Bowles, in his capacity as Regional Manager of Lincoln Property Company, Incorporated and others
Wangala v. Telka, LLC, et al.
as 4:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
Mata Wangala
Defendant:
Telka, LLC, Agyle Networks, LLC and Rajiv Parekh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Haire v. 5445 Caruth Haven Lane Apartments Owner LLC et al
as 3:2021cv03127
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Haire
Defendant:
5445 Caruth Haven Lane Apartments Owner LLC, Lincoln Property Company Inc, Travis Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00113
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lafayette Lake Lodging L L v. Parekh et al
as 6:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Lake Lodging L L C
Defendant:
Siddharth Parekh , Parekh Architects P L L C and A B C Insurance Co
Counter_claimant:
Parekh Architects P L L C
Counter_defendant:
Lafayette Lake Lodging L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parekh v. African Raptor M/V
as 2:2016cv14729
Plaintiff:
Nayana Ambarish Parekh
Defendant:
African Raptor M/V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Parekh v. Argonautica Shipping Investments B.V. et al
as 2:2016cv13731
Plaintiff:
Nayana Ambarish Parekh
Defendant:
Weber Marine, Inc., Absolute Outdoor, Inc. and African Raptor Shipping Company, LTD
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Parekh v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2010cv01591
Plaintiff:
Naresh Parekh
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
