Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robinson v. Coker et al
as 4:2022cv04181
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Robinson
Defendant:
Ernest Colcer, Patricia Lykos and Ernest Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Leath v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Leath
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leath v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00155
Petitioner:
Patrick Eugene Leath
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilstrap v. Casey et al
as 6:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Gilstrap
Defendant:
Kendal Casey and Henderson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malley v. State of Texas
as 21-20387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick Eugene Malley
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Robinson v. Knock
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Robinson
Defendant:
FNU Knock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marble v. Thomas et al
as 3:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Marble
Defendant:
J. Dewayne Thomas, John and Jane Does 1-100 and Doe Corporations 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heri et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv02879
Plaintiff:
Veledin Heri , Thelma Corry , Robert Steele and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrison v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv02961
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eugene Morrison
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
