Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Parker v. Facebook et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Facebook and Meta
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Parker v. Chet Morrison Contractors LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05122
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Chet Morrison Contractors LLC and Morrison Energy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stefano v. ASI Lloyds
as 4:2022cv01558
Plaintiff:
Robert Stefano
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
USA v. Stefano Vitale
as 19-20784
Defendant / Appellant:
STEFANO GUIDO VITALE, also known as Steven Michael Vincent Palizzi, also known as Steven Nakayama, also known as Steve
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Germinale v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2019cv04429
Plaintiff:
Stefano Germinale
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vitale v. United States Of America
as 4:2019cv02708
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Stefano Guido Vitale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hudson Insurance Company v. Horizone Construction I, Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Rosa M. De Stefano, Luis R. De Stefano, Rent & Build, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pontikis v. Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp.
as 4:2018cv00777
Plaintiff:
Stefanos Pontikis
Defendant:
Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Stefano Vitale
as 17-20025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEFANO GUIDO VITALE, also known as Steven Michael Vincent Palizzi, also known as Steven Nakayama, also known as Steve
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
