Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Jackson v. Stott et al
as 1:2023cv01504
Plaintiff:
Jamarious Jackson
Defendant:
Eric Stott, Major Allen, Captain Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Toney Edwards, Eric Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williford v. Stott et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Petitioner:
Jonathan Williford
Respondent:
Unknown Stott and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Ramirez, Deputy B. R. Anderson, Deputy J. Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ramirez et al
as 7:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Ramirez, Deputy B. R. Anderson, Deputy J. Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartie v. LaSalle Corrections L L C et al
as 1:2021cv04074
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bartie
Defendant:
LaSalle Corrections L L C, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Catahoula Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Garland
as 21-20372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ceundric Campbell and Sye Newton
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, Director of US Marshal S John #1 Doe, Erin Epley and others
Stott v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alicia Stott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swain v. LaSalle Management Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00907
Defendant:
LaSalle Management Inc, Ford, Wascom and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Darryl Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stotts v. Berryhill
as 9:2018cv00199
Plaintiff:
Pamela K Stotts
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.