Cases 1 - 10 of 8,014
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Buth v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Van Buth
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Scott v. Cupp
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Wynston Scott
Defendant:
A Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Williamson Cty, TX
as 24-50384
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Williamson County, Texas
Scott v. M.D.O.C.
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Donny McGail Scott
Defendant:
M.D.O.C.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Donny McGail Scott
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Donny McGail Scott
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Inc. et al v. Spellmon et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Inc., Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association-West, Waterkeeper Alliance and others
Defendant:
Lt. Gen. Scott A. Spellmon, Col. Cullen Jones and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
