Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silas Thomas
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aggieland Infinity Real Estate Management, Inc. et al v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB et al
as 4:2023cv02606
Plaintiff:
Aggieland Infinity Real Estate Management, Inc. and Silas montgomery
Defendant:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Residential Mortgage Aggregation Trust, Churchill Funding I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Theriot v. Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Silas Theriot
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company, Sunbelt Crushing LLC, Jonathan Taylor Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Silas v. McDonalds et al
as 1:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tworn Delance Silas, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown McDonalds, Unknown Fuller, Elaine Lege and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 22-40574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Silas Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Board of Pardon and Parole
Silas v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Tammy Renee Silas
Respondent:
FNU Smith and Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sila v. USA
as 3:2022cv01340
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ndungi Sila
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
