Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Stapleton v. Lozano
as 26-40373
Plaintiff:
Dawn Stapleton, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joshua Stapleton and Jacqueline Louise Stapleton
Defendant:
Ernesto Lozano, Justin Lee Becerra, Cesar Solis and others
Ricks v. Murrill et al
as 3:2025cv01092
Defendant:
Elizabeth Murrill, Terrel T. Kent, Sheryl M. Ranatza and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Louisiana Parole Board et al
as 3:2025cv01068
Defendant:
Louisiana Parole Board, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stapleton v. Mihm
as 3:2025cv02413
Plaintiff:
Fransohn Stapleton
Defendant:
Judge Michael Mihm
Interested Party:
Ronee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Barras et al
as 3:2025cv00698
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel Barras, Carolyn Stapleton, Steven Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Barras et al
as 2:2025cv01454
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel Barras, Carolyn Stapleton, Steven Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt v. Texas Southern University et al
as 4:2025cv02537
Plaintiff:
Edward Gantt
Defendant:
Texas Southern University, John Pittman, Paula Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Stapleton v. Rollins, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00321
Defendant:
Jordan M. Penney and Rollins, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Loretta Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stapleton v. Lozano
as 24-40155
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Louise Stapleton and Dawn Stapleton, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joshua Stapleton
Defendant:
Ernesto Lozano, Justin Lee Becerra and Cesar Solis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
