Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lawton v. Apex Trader Funding Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv02078
Plaintiff:
Steven Lawton
Defendant:
Apex Trader Funding Inc., Darrell Roland Martin and John Mark Skelton
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
Stevens v. NTSB
as 26-60591
Petitioner:
Joel Colby Stevens
Respondent:
National Transportation Safety Board
Johnson v. Horton et al
as 4:2026cv00916
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Kirk Horton, William Norris, Billy Kenyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tendo v. Blanche
as 26-60590
Petitioner:
Steven Tendo
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Johnson v. Horton et al
as 7:2026cv00083
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Kirk Horton, William Norris, Billy Kenyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bear et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2026cv05778
Plaintiff:
AMANDA CAROLE BEAR and STEVEN BEAR
Defendant:
STATE FARM LLOYDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shayne et al v. Howell et al
as 4:2026cv05761
Plaintiff:
Alan Shayne and Alan Trenk
Defendant:
Steven Howell and CRST Expedited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00792
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sencial v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2026cv00204
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2026cv00512
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Unknown Robinson, Tamala King, Unknown Riley and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
