Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Bell v. City of Teague
as 6:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bell
Defendant:
City of Teague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Teague v. Henderson et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
McKinley Teague
Defendant:
Brandon Tyler Henderson, Southern Line Contractors, Inc. and Mary Butler Teague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Teague v. Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Steven Teague
Defendant:
Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Teague
as 22-11228
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Calvin Dean Teague
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Teague v. Henderson et al
as 5:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Mary Butler Teague
Defendant:
Brandon Tyler Henderson, Southern Line Contractors, Inc. and Greenwich Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Teague v. Arnold
as 1:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dale Teague, Jr.
Defendant:
Van Arnold
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
