Cases 1 - 10 of 8,137
Alexander v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Welborn Alexander
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sertuche v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Simon Sertuche
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Constant
as 1:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Douglas Constant and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
**SANCTIONED/BARRED* Charlesetta Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
as 7:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 24-10523
Plaintiff:
Edward Brockman
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Sharron Wilson, Assistant Prosecutor William Knight and others
Langford v. JPMorgan Chase Co. et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Langford
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Co., Ashley Unknown, Jackie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Marsh v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Tina Garner Marsh
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and Unknown John Doe Defendants One Through Ten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demas v. City of McAllen Police
as 24-40238
Plaintiff:
Evenson Demas
Defendant:
City of McAllen Police Department, Peter Boyko, individually and as agent of City of McAllen Police Department and Comfort Awuku, individually and other officers unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
