Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cockburn v. Martin
as 2:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Cockburn and Matthew Ramon Cockburn
Defendant:
Willie Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragas v. Schexnayder et al
as 2:2017cv09663
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ragas
Defendant:
James Schexnayder, St. James Parish Sheriff's Office, Dustin Poche and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. City of Temple, TX et al
as 6:2017cv00211
Defendant:
City of Temple, TX, John Nash and Officer Michael Thomburg
Plaintiff:
Willis Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Stonkus v. St. James Parish Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 2:2016cv15612
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stonkus
Defendant:
St James Parish Sheriff's Dept, Willie Martin, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stonkus v. St. James Parish Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00499
Defendant:
Willie Martin, Matt Rundle, E. Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stonkus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-31048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Christy Banks , Willie Simon , Mary Branch and others
Defendant:
Frank Williams and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. City of Temple, TX et al
as 6:2010cv00166
Defendant:
City of Temple, TX, Lee Crossley, Wayne Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Willis . Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. Martin et al
as 2:2010cv01491
Plaintiff:
Wayne Joseph
Defendant:
Willy Martin, Jr. and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Waguespac et al
as 2:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
Evan E. Cooper
Defendant:
Glenn Waguespac, Willie Martin, Vanessa Roussel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
