Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Watkins v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Michel Watkins
Defendant:
Pentagon Federal Credit Union and James Schenck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Schenck v. Bienville Orthopaedic Specialists, LLC
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Guy Schenck
Defendant:
Bienville Orthopaedic Specialists, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Williams v. Bienville Orthopaedic Specialists, LLC
as 1:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Defendant:
Bienville Orthopaedic Specialists, LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert Fendley, Guy Schenck, Debbie Slusser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Schenck
as 22-30655
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Randy Jonal Schenck, also known as RuRu Schenck, also known as Shaq Schenck
USA v. Schenck
as 21-10146
Defendant / Appellant:
Phillip Schenck
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01346
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Umphress v. Hall
as 20-11216
Defendant / Appellee:
Janis Holt, in their official capacity as a Member of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, David Schenck, in their official capacity as a Member of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Steve Fischer, in their official capacity as a Member of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian Keith Umphress
Appellee:
Clifton Roberson and Clifton Robinson
Umphress v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00253
Defendant:
Sujeeth B. Draksharam, Valerie Ertz, Steve Fischer and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Umphress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Phillip Schenck
as 19-10941
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILLIP SCHENCK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Schenck v. USA
as 4:2019cv00229
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Phillip Schenck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
