Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Pete v. Wright et al
as 2:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Norman Pete
Defendant:
Charles Gary Wain Wright, Assistant District Attorney and Powell Wingfield Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant:
B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingfield v. Garner
as 23-40547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Garner, CO, Unknown Hinejosa, CO, Unknown Ellis, Sergeant, Michael Unit and others
Wingfield v. Adekoya
as 9:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Adesunkanmi Adekoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Garner et al
as 6:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Unknown Garner, Unknown Hinejosa and Unknown Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Garner et al
as 9:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Unknown Garner, Unknown Hinejosa and Unknown Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Geneticare Health Solutions et al
as 4:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Brandon Muzik, Preston Wingfield, Geneticare Health Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Wingfield v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Unknown Adekoya, Lt Unknown Cannon, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2018cv00144
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wingfield v. Sanofi US Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06469
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
