Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Joiner et al v. Hirschbach Motor Lines Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Joiner and Cordell Gibson
Defendant:
Hirschbach Motor Lines Inc and Jessie Ladale Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Witherspoon Holdings, Inc. v. Coyote Logistics, LLC
as 5:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Witherspoon Holdings, Inc. doing business as Witherspoon Transport
Defendant:
Coyote Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caston v. City of Magnolia, Mississippi et al
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jesse Caston
Defendant:
City of Magnolia, Mississippi, Tammy Witherspoon and Sonya Woodall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cloyd v. KBR
as 21-20676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Cloyd, Nickalandra Witherspoon and Lucila Andrade
Defendant / Appellee:
KBR, Incorporated and KBR, Inc.
Worrall et al v. Love et al
as 3:2021cv02602
Plaintiff:
Paul Craig Worrall, Emily Longmire, Jazmin Witherspoon and others
Defendant:
Timothy Love, LOVE STYLE INC, LDWB KNOX LLC d/b/a LONESOME DOVE WESTERN BISTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
McKenzie v. McKenzie
as 4:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brooks McKenzie
Defendant:
Kelli Marie McKenzie, Dawn King, Kelly Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Waybourn
as 21-10649
Respondent / Appellee:
Bill Waybourn, Sheriff
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edwin Horton Witherspoon
Witherspoon v. McDuffie
as 21-10723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edwin Horton Witherspoon, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Wesley McDuffie
Witherspoon v. Smead et al
as 4:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Edwin Horton Witherspoon, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Smead #664, FNU Andrews, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
