Cases 1 - 10 of 6,128
Bennett v. Abebe et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Bennett
Defendant:
FNU Abebe and Dr. Christopher S Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson et al v. Montford Unit Officials
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Scott Simpson, Clark Beckett, Carlton Mack and others
Defendant:
Montford Unit Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Greenidge v. Carter
as 24-10535
Plaintiff:
Kevin Greenidge
Defendant:
Philip Michael Carter, Richard Gregory Tilford and Bob Eugene Guess
Brown v. Lumen Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Lumen Technologies Inc., Kate Johnson, Quincy L. Allen and others
Debnam v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Kevin Debnam
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Baird et al
as 5:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lee Lucas
Defendant:
Jake Baird, Lonnie Nail, Vincent Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Diggs
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Frank
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, Tanya Vega, Kevin Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Clarke et al v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clarke, Trevor Boeckmann, Harry Crane and others
Defendant:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
