Cases 131 - 140 of 845,699
Lapidus v. Barbell Apparel, LLC
as 0:2024cv62030
Plaintiff:
Michael Lapidus
Defendant:
Barbell Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Janvier v. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Licensing
as 6:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
John Peterson Janvier
Defendant:
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Licensing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00581
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gervat v. Dennison et al
as 1:2024cv04953
Defendant:
Ted D. Waitman, Dennis S. Schemm, Michael C. Dennison and others
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Malo Flores v. Corsi et al
as 1:2024cv11133
Defendant:
James R Martin, Michael J Corsi, Bryan Monahan and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Enrique Malo Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lee v. Taylor-Barrios et al
as 1:2024cv11147
Defendant:
D. Konczal, Tom Dart, Jefferson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Smiley et al
as 3:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Jaylyn Parker
Defendant:
Hall, Deflice, Sonneberg and others
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUST v. MURPHY
as 1:2024cv10140
Defendant:
PATRICK M. MURPHY
Plaintiff:
PETER BLUST
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
JAMISON v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2024cv10154
Plaintiff:
KASON JAMISON
Defendant:
CHRISLYN MORGAN, DAWN DOUGHERTY, JORGE COONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv05776
Defendant:
GWENDOLYN LANE, U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT, SAMIR WITHERSPOON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
