Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 71,197
Padgett et al v. The County of Meade, Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff: Theresa Padgett and David Padgett
Defendant: The County of Meade, Kentucky and John Doe Nos. I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Evolution New Jersey, LLC
as 2:2024cv11566
Plaintiff: Lakesha Spencer
Defendant: Evolution New Jersey, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Masserman v. Boston Medical Center
as 4:2024cv11565
Plaintiff: Cindy Masserman
Defendant: Boston Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11563
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01012
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILKINSON et al v. City of Dayton Ohio et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff: PATRICIA WILKINSON, Keeley Nelson, Darlene Guynn and others
Defendant: City of Dayton Ohio, Kamron Afzal, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03225
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Neisen v. Atwood
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff: Heather Neisen
Defendant: Judge Bonita Jo Atwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?