Cases 91 - 100 of 1,634
Stephen Wlodarz v. Mike Parris
as 23-5433
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN B. WLODARZ
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE PARRIS, Warden
Smith v. Criss et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael R Smith
Defendant:
Nurse Criss, B Oham and Knox County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles #439074 v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kennith Myles #439074
Defendant:
Unknown Carr, Unknown Miller, Matt Macauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
Hector Joyner and USP Big Sandy, Director of Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tims v. Garland
as 2:2023cv02248
Petitioner:
William Tims
Respondent:
U.S.A. and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans #367619 v. Atearn et al
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
J. Atearn, Matthew Macauley, R. Browkaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hall v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 23-3303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, CYNTHIA B. MAUSSER, Deputy Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections Division of Parole and Community Service, JIM BEDRA, former member of the Ohio Department of Rehabiliation and Correction Parole Board and others
Michael Hensley v. USA
as 23-5287
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. HENSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Emmanuel Patrick v. Sarah Schroeder, et al
as 23-1313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL PATRICK, aka Emanuel David Alfaro Patrick
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden, D. VITTALA, Assistant Deputy Warden, PHYSICAL PLANT SUPERVISOR SUNDHOLM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
