Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 99,873
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff: Roger Bowling
Defendant: Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grasty v. Pounds
as 3:2024cv00587
Petitioner: Quinzell Grasty
Respondent: Zack Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff: Tony L. Norman
Defendant: Davidson County Sheriff's Office, C. Taylor and Jessica Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. ODRC Director et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Larry White
Defendant: ODRC Director, Le.C.I Warden, Le.C.I Warden's Ms. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Philpot et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Lydia Shepherd
Defendant: Tabitha Philpot and Sabrina Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethune v. USA
as 1:2024cv00848
Petitioner: Brandon Bethune
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Campbell County 17th District Court
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Gerald Nugget Williams
Defendant: Campbell County 17th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Wellpath Care et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff: Ronnie Lashea Robertson and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant: Wellpath Care, Richard Holiday, Latrena Demens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Cox v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1418
Petitioner: JASON RICHARD COX
Respondent: BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Anthony Grimes v. Tim Lane
as 24-5456
Petitioner: ANTHONY THOMAS GRIMES
Respondent: TIM LANE, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?